A List of Interjections and Exclamations in English

Ow! Ack! Yikes! No doubt, anyone familiar with comic books is well versed in these pithy little utterances. Interjections (or, as theyre sometimes—somewhat misleadingly—called, exclamations) are words or short phrases that stand apart from the rest of a sentence grammatically or appear on their own without a subject and verb. Because theyre often used to exclaim, interjections often pack an emotional punch that can make fictional dialogue more realistic. Key Takeaways: Interjections Interjections are short phrases often used to exclaim.They can stand on their own as sentences. Interjections are the outlaws of English grammar as illustrated in this writers other interjections piece: Interjections usually stand apart from normal sentences, defiantly maintaining their syntactic independence. (Yeah!) They arent marked inflectionally for grammatical categories such as tense or number. (No sirree!) And because they show up more frequently in spoken English than in writing, most scholars have chosen to ignore them. (Aw.) 101 Interjections As you read through this list, see if you can pick out the interjections that have more than one meaning or can be used in more than one way. Additional spellings or usages are listed in parentheses. Ah: Ah, I dont know if thats true.Aha: Aha! I figured it out!Ahem: Ahem, could you boys stop talking so we could get on with class, please?Alas: Alas, it was not to be.Amen: Amen, hallelujah, amen!Aw: Aw, do we have to?Awesome: You two are dating? Awesome!Aww: Aww, thats so cute!Bada-bing (bada-bing, bada-bing, bada-boom): Youve gotta get up close like this and—bada-BING!—you blow their brains all over your nice Ivy League suit. (From The Godfather, 1972)Bah: Bah, humbug!Baloney: Oh, baloney. I dont believe that.Big deal: Big deal. Who cares?Bingo: Bingo! Right on target!Boo: Boo! Scared you!Boo-hoo: That makes me sad. Boo-hoo.Booyah (boo-yah): Yeah, I aced this test. Booyah!Boy (boy oh boy): Oh boy. Oh boy, oh boy. Thats heavy, man.Bravo: Bravo! That was fantastic!Brilliant: Brilliant, luv, absolutely brilliant! (British English.)Brrr: Brr! Minus 30 degrees? Yuk.Bull: Bull. Its not 30 below zero, not really.Bye (bye-bye): Bye! See you later!Cheers: Cheers, mate! Youre welcome. (British English); Cheers! Raise a toast! (American English.)Come on (cmon): Come on. Hurry up.Cool: Oh, wow, that is so cool!Cowabunga: Cowabunga, dude. (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles)Dang: Dang it! Whered I put that?Darn (darn it): Darn it! I cant find the other one either!Dear me: Oh, dear me. What are we going to do?Duck: Duck! No, really! Get down!Duh: Well, duh. I cant believe you didnt know that.Eh: Eh? What?Enjoy: Enjoy! I hope you like it!Excellent: Party time, excellent! (Waynes World)Fabulous: Fabulous! Thats just wonderful!Fantastic: Fantastic! I just love it!Fiddledeedee  (fiddle-dee-dee): Fiddle-dee-dee! War, war, war; this war talks spoiling all the fun at every party this spring. I get so bored I could scream. (Gone With the Wind)Finally: Finally! I never thought thatd be done.For heavens sake(s): Oh, for heavens sake, dont you know your Bible? (Little House on the Prairie)Fore: Fore! (Look out! in golf)Foul: Foul! In baseball, the ball went out of bounds, otherwise an infraction.Freeze: Freeze! Stop right there!Gee (gee whiz, gee willikers): Well gee whiz, Pa, why do I have to do that?Giddyap (giddyup): Giddyup, Silver! Go, horse, go!Golly (good golly, golly gee  willikers): Golly, that sure was tasty.Goodbye (good-bye): Goodbye, see you again soon!Good grief: Good grief, Charlie Brown. (Peanuts)Good heavens: Good heavens! How did that happen?Gosh: â€Å"Whatever I feel like I wanna do, gosh!† (Napoleon Dynamite)Great: Great! Im so excited youll come along!Great balls of fire: Goodness gracious, great balls of fire! (Great Balls of Fire, Jerry Lee Lewis)Ha: Ha-ha! Thats funny!Hallelujah: Glory be to God, hallelujah!Heavens (heavens above, heavens to Betsy): Oh, heavens! How could you think that?Heigh-ho: Heigh-ho neighbor! How are you?Hello: Hello! How are things with you?Help: Help! I need somebody (Help! The Beatles)Hey (hey there): Hey! Look over there!Hi (hiya): Hi! Whats up?Hip, hip, hooray: We won! On the count of thre e, everyone: Hip, hip hooray! Hip, hip, hooray!Hmm (hrm): Hmm. Let me think about that for a bit.Ho-ho-ho: Ho-ho-ho, Merry Christmas!Holy mackerel (holy cow, holy moly, holy Moses, holy smokes): Holy mackerel! I cant believe it!Ho-hum: Ho-hum, how boring.Hooray (hurrah, hurray): Hooray! Thats awesome!Howdy (howdy do): Howdy, pardner.Huh: Huh. I have no idea.Ick: Ick! How gross!Indeed: Indeed! Ill bet you didnt know that!Jeez: Jeez, do we really have to go through this now?Kaboom: Kaboom! It blew up!Kapow: And Batman hit the evildoer, kapow!Lordy (lordy, lordy): Oh lordy, lordy, look whos 40!Mama mia: Mama mia, let me go. (Bohemian Rhapsody, Queen)Man: Man, thats unbelievable.Marvelous: Marvelous! Oh, honey, thats just wonderful.My: My! I never once thought of it, Huck! (The Adventures of Tom Sawyer)My goodness (my heavens, my stars, my word): My goodness, isnt that just grand?Nah: Nah, itll never work.No problem: Thank you. No problem.No way (no way Josà ©): No way! I cant believe it.Nope: Nope. I cant do that.Nuts: Nuts! I wish I didnt have to.Oh (oh boy, oh dear, oh my, oh my gosh, oh my goodness, oh no, oh well): Oh! Thats shocking!OK (okay): OK, sounds great. Thank you.Ouch: Ouch! That hurt!Ow: Ow! That stung!Please: Would you help me, please?Poof: Poof! She just disappeared.Shh: Shh! Quiet in the library!Super: Super! Thats fantastic!Swell: Swell! How great!Welcome: Welcome! Come in!; (Youre) Welcome!Well: Well, I just dont know about that.Whoop-de-doo: Well whoop-de-doo. (sarcasm) I so dont care.Woo-hoo: Woo-hoo! Thats fantastic!Wow: Wow! I love it!Yabba dabba doo: Yabba dabba doo! (The Flinstones)Yadda, yadda, yadda: Well, we were engaged to be married, uh, we bought the wedding invitations, and, uh, yada, yada, yada, Im still single. (Seinfeld)Yippee: Yippie! Thats exciting!Yummy: Yummy! I love chocolate cake! Single or Double-Duty Parts of Speech Interjections have traditionally been treated as one of the eight parts of speech  (or word classes). But its worth keeping in mind that many interjections  can do double or triple duty as other parts of speech. For instance, when a  word such as boy or awesome appears by itself (often followed by an exclamation point in writing), it functions as an interjection: Boy! You have an answer for everything.The crew chief handed me my first paycheck. Awesome! I said. But when that same word shows up syntactically integrated into a sentence, it usually operates as a different part of speech. In the following examples, boy is a noun, and awesome is an adjective: The boy ate a Snickers bar.Seeing the northern lights for the first time was an awesome experience. Words that are used only  as interjections are called primary interjections, while words that also belong to other word classes are called secondary interjections.   Oh! Heres something else to look out for. The meanings of interjections sometimes change depending on the context  in which theyre used. The word oh, for example, may indicate surprise, disappointment, or delight: Oh! I didnt see you sitting there.Oh...I was hoping you could stay for a while.Oh! Im so glad you came!

Nietzsche Morality Essay - 1389 Words

Morality Essay Have you ever asked yourself where your conscience comes from? The feeling that takes a hold of you when you do what you feel is wrong. This feeling is almost like a consequence when you tell a lie or commit a crime. Your conscience helps you sort out the good and bad and feels your mind with sorrow when you see a sad story on the news or gives you the initiative to donate money to a contribution. But where does it come from. Is it something you are naturally born with, taught over time or given to you by a higher power? This argument leads to the existence of moral values by many philosophers including William Lane Craig. One of his excerpts argues that if there is an existence of moral values, which some people agree,†¦show more content†¦With this said, Nietzsche would not agree with Craig. His idea on perspectivism also shows that he would not agree. One idea is the real verse the apparent world, which he states that language and grammar tricks us to imagine there is a n essence for what makes up the things we see. For example the idea that lightening flashes is false because in reality the lightening is the flash. He would use this in his argument towards the existence of moral values and God because not everyone sees things the same way. Nietzsches examples show that he does not believe in moral values and does not believe in God. Craig argues back with Nietzsches idea that proclaimed that the death of God meant the destruction of all meaning and value in life. In Williams excerpt he says that Nietzsche is right but weve got to be careful because the question is not must we believe in God in order to live a moral life? Craig doesnt believe that we do. Nor is the question: Can we recognize objective moral values without believing in God? Because he does believe that you can recognize them. Rather, the question is: If God does not exist, do objective morals exist? Craig proves that they do by explaining that actions such as rape, torture, and chil d abuse arent just socially acceptable behavior. And that they are moral abominations and that there are some things that are really wrong and everyone knows it. Craig also says in his excerpt that evenShow MoreRelatedNietzsche on Slave Morality Essay727 Words   |  3 Pagesâ€Å"Nietzsche on Judeo-Christian Morality† In Nietzsche’s aphorisms 90-95 and 146-162 he attacks what he believes to be the fundamental basis of the â€Å"slave† morality prevalent in the Judeo-Christian tradition as well as other religions and societies. From the beginning, he distinguishes the two different types of moralities he believes to exist: the â€Å"master morality†, created by rulers of societies, and the â€Å"slave† morality, created by the lowest people in societies. The former stresses virtuesRead MoreWhat does Nietzsche’s Mr. Daredevil-Curiosity report, when he metaphorically peers into the1700 Words   |  7 Pagesclaims? Humanity, according to Nietzsche, is infected by an illness. It is the kind of illness that has infected every single man, religious or non-religious alike. It is his aim to release his readers from the illness. In much the same way as a doctor, he wishes to do so by primarily sourcing the cause of the illness, and secondly by diagnosing it. It is Nietzsche’s belief that this metaphoric illness is morality. It is a striking project; comprised of three essays- each with the aim of strippingRead MoreNietzsche : Genealogy Of Morals854 Words   |  4 Pageswhat is Nietzsche: Genealogy of Morals going to tell us about these morals that will show us that what we do is more about those humanly principles rather than legal principle? Nietzsche: Genealogy of Morals is consisted of 3 essays about morals. I will be talking and summarizing the first essay that he wrote for the Genealogy of Morals. Nietzsche expresses his dissatisfaction with certain English psychologists. He s not too happy with them because they try to explain the origin or morality and claimRead MoreNietzsche s Morals889 Words   |  4 Pages1887, philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche had written a collection of essays entitled The Genealogy of Morals. Nietzsche ideas was an inscribed assessment based upon ethical principles. Nietzsche analyzes the connections and significance of the contrasting moral concepts in a distinctive section where he elaborates on the â€Å"good and the bad† as well as the â€Å"good and evil†, by expressing his thoughts on slave morality that was created by the Jews. In the beginning, Nietzsche states that the priest is worthlessRead MoreEssay on Nietzsche1296 Words   |  6 PagesNietzsche I think that the three questions that I will try to find answers are highly interconnected with each other and because of this reason, I will not answer them separately. I will be answering them without order. First of all, from my interpretation of Nietzsche, modern humanity did not invent the idea of God. Rather the God had a functional role from his point of view. There is no doubt that, modern humanity had the idea of God, but in my opinion, this idea was like a heritage to theRead MoreExamining Good and Bad Conscience in Friedrich Nietzsches Genealogy of Morals1625 Words   |  7 PagesFriedrich Nietzsche is recognized for being one of the most influential German philosophers of the modern era. He is known for his works on genealogy of morality, which is a way to study values and concepts. In Genealogy of Morals, Friedrich Nietzsche mentions that values and concepts have a history because of the many different meanings that come with it. Nietzsche focused on traditional ethical theories, especially those rooted in religion. Not being a religious man, he believed that human lifeRead MoreExamples Of Nietzsche And Slave Morality713 Words   |  3 PagesNietzsche attempts to redefine in this first essay the idea of good and evil, or more importantly, the different views of good an evil taken by two classes of people. For Nietzsche, these two classes are the master morality and the slave morality. To understand their different views Nietzsche explains the origins of each group. The master morality stems from nobility, the powerful, who considers strength and health, and happiness as all good things. They are those that take life head on, so to sayRead MoreModern Existentialism : Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche And National Socialism1510 Words   |  7 PagesFriedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche (1844-1900) was one of the most influential philosophers and intellectual thinkers of the 19th century. He is considered one of the founders of modern existentialism, and his works have influenced various philosophers such as Martin Heidegger and Georges Bataille. His works often ran perpendicular to conventional beliefs of his time, and was received in numerous respects. Nietzsche really did not care who you were, or what it was, he had a criticism on almost everythingRead MoreOrigin Of Morality Vs Nietzsche950 Words   |  4 PagesFriedrich Nietzsche was a German philosopher who wrote a book called On the Genealogy of Morals. This book is comprised of three different essays, a nd the first essay is titled â€Å"’Good and Evil,’ ‘Good and Bad.’† Rather than going straight into what Nietzsche talks about in his first essay, it would be better to start off by breaking down the title of his book. The Oxford English Dictionary defines genealogy as â€Å"an account of one’s descent from an ancestor or ancestors, by enumeration of the intermediateRead MoreThis piece of work will try to find the answer to the question ‘In Nietzsche’s first essay in the600 Words   |  3 Pagesquestion ‘In Nietzsche’s first essay in the Genealogy of Morals, does he give a clear idea of what good and bad truly are and what his opinion of those ideas is’. It will give a brief overview of his first essay, it will also go into greater detail of what he claims good and bad truly are, and finally look at what he is trying to prove with this argument. It will look at his background in order to see if and how that has influenced his work and opinions. Nietzsche introduces the differences between

Potential Mechanism For Clarifying Habits -Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Potential Mechanism For Clarifying Habits? Answer: Introducation Communication is the process of sending and receiving information between two or more people (Habermas, 2015). Communication is a process that cannot be completed with only one person. From the advent of human race, communication has been a very important phenomenon that is required for the exchange of information. The one who sends the information is known as the sender while the one on the other end is known as the receiver (McQuail Windahl, 2015). The information that is passed in the communication cycle reflects various ideas, opinions and thought process of those who are involved in the process. According to Broadbent (2013), the various kind of communication are mentioned below- Verbal communication Non-Verbal communication Written communication Visual representations such as maps, symbols and graphs. Effective communication is one of the most important skills to have in this modern world because effectively passing on the information is mandatory to avoid conflict or any issues (Shockley-Zalabak, 2014). I have faced situations where incomplete communication has lead to many problems including confusion, hurting of sentiments and even conflicts. When I communicate with people I make sure that, the entire information is passed on to the recipients and that I clearly state the ideas. My motive remains that people must clearly understand what I wish to convey, and them agreeing to it or not is completely upon them. This clarity increases the level of trust that people have on the communicator and it makes me feel confident. I have successfully passed on difficult messages to people using effective communication skills and have experienced no conflict or trust issues among the people. When I saw people having a negative image among people and being referred to as an unfriendly person, I realized that the problem was lack of effective communication on the part of that individual. Hence, it allowed me to pursue a positive body language while dealing with people and it has enhanced my public relations massively. Barriers to communication are known as the aspects that deter the communication process and hinder the transfer of information from the sender to receiver (Conrad, 2014). In my first encounter with my office colleagues, I was apprehensive and rather shy to communicate with them. This led them to believing that I am a person with ego and I am a weak communicator. However, soon I understood that I had to get rid of my shyness and apprehensions. The moment I got away from those barriers, colleagues became friends for me and soon we started to share light moments in the team and entire work environment became better for me. Barriers may be of various kinds such as fear, lack of knowledge, natural phenomenon, trust issues, self-image and personal interests (Wibeck, 2014). Individuals can communicate freely with each other keeping the barriers aside but this is not always possible because language may sometimes become a barrier and the receiver may not be aware of a foreign language that t he sender is speaking. Such barriers are very common and lead to communication gap between people in foreign places. Barriers hinder effective communication and this leads people being distanced from each other due to lack of communication. Self-awareness is the ability of an individual to understand their own personality and make an analysis of the various strengths and weakness in their character (Vago, 2014). It is a fact that a person can be happy only if there is awareness about the self. Self-awareness allows me to understand the various qualities that I have in my character. When I face an interview, I stay confident about it because I know where my strengths are and how I can use them to impress the interviewer. Having an idea of the weakness also allows me stay away from areas that can put me into trouble and hence I can work accordingly. The challenges that are posed by various situations can be better analyzed because I know the limits to which I can push myself in order to achieve a target in life. The art of self-awareness came to my attention when I started taking interest in self-talk sessions. Self-talk has benefitted me hugely in allowing me to assess myself in light of the situations that demand my act ion in any form. In this world of globalization, the confluence of culture in the workplace is one of the most evident characteristics of business communication. Cross-cultural communication skills are the most sought after skill sets looked after by leading organizations in their employees and new recruits (Piller, 2013). I am a person who likes communicating with people and hence never faced issues related to cross-cultural communication. Being able in freely communicating with people from various backgrounds, I have learned many things from them and it has improved many skills of mine. Co-ordination is mandatory in the workplace because every organization looks for people who will work as a team and achieve the common goal of the organization. In order to achieve the common goal, it is must for individuals to communicate with each other without any kind of apprehension or barrier in their communication process. Treating people from different ethnic group or culture only complicates the situation a nd worsens the overall performance because it induces bias practices and hence de-motivates the person or group that is treated differently because of culture or ethnicity (Modood, 2017). I feel that such communication should be practiced as people can always learn something new from other culture and their thought process may provide positive aspirations in workplace. Ethical decision-making lays the foundation for successful business communication. Whenever I see someone making a decision impulsively based on personal motives and without a morality that supports the right cause, I can sense the fault in the entire decision making process. Often such decisions backfire and lead to failure and harm the entire organization or team. Learning from those faulty decisions of others, I have started to evaluate a situation deeply before coming to a decision. There are always various implications to a decision that will be taken and all of the implications have to be kept in mind before taking a decision. Ethical decision-making process includes on the part of decision maker to be able to take decisions that are morally correct irrespective of the cost (Crossan, Mazutis Seijts, 2013). I have seen that foreseeing the consequences always helps in taking the decision and it enables me to have a backup in case things go wrong. Taking such ethical decisions ha s led to people gaining confidence on me and the fairness has made people believe that I am a wise person and can be trusted with complicated issues. In order to take ethical approach in decision making it is essential for individuals to refrain from any kind of bias attitude or prejudgments towards the issues that are at hand and needed to be taken a call upon. To conclude, it is essential to have an open approach towards the various issues that may arise in communicating at the professional level. I had weaknesses in communicating with unknown people, but with time I realized that having such an attitude will lead to loss on my part and people will have a wrong perception about me. Hence, I stepped out of my comfort zone, interacted with everyone, and made sure that none of the barriers interrupted my communication process. This lead to people winning trust on me and my overall image became better among them and I received a greater acceptance on all fronts in the workplace. Reference Broadbent, D. E. (2013).Perception and communication. Elsevier. Conrad, D. (2014). Workplace communication problems: Inquiries by employees and applicable solutions.Journal of business studies quarterly,5(4), 105. Crossan, M., Mazutis, D., Seijts, G. (2013). In search of virtue: The role of virtues, values and character strengths in ethical decision making.Journal of Business Ethics,113(4), 567-581. Habermas, J. (2015).Communication and the Evolution of Society. John Wiley Sons. McQuail, D., Windahl, S. (2015).Communication models for the study of mass communications. Routledge. Modood, T. (2017). Must Interculturalists misrepresent multiculturalism?.Comparative migration studies,5(1), 15. Piller, I. (2013). Language choice in bilingual, cross-cultural interpersonal communication.Linguistik online,5(1). Shockley-Zalabak, P. (2014).Fundamentals of organizational communication. Pearson. Vago, D. R. (2014). Mapping modalities of self?awareness in mindfulness practice: a potential mechanism for clarifying habits of mind.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,1307(1), 28-42. Wibeck, V. (2014). Enhancing learning, communication and public engagement about climate changesome lessons from recent literature.Environmental Education Research,20(3), 387-411.

The Changing Meaning of Concepts Throughout History free essay sample

In this essay I will summarize how the philosophers Friedrich Nietzsche and Michel Foucault have recorded how the meanings of certain concepts have changed through history, paying close attention to the texts of Nietzsches Good and Evil, Good and Bad and Foucaults The Insane. I will also suggest what I believe are the philosophical lessons that they think we can draw from recognizing these changes. In the chapter from his book Madness Civilization,The Insane, Michel Foucault charts the changing conceptions of madness from the Renaissance through to the Neo-Classical Age. He notes how during the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, though madness was sometimes treated as a personification of evil, it was something that was openly dealt with, the public outrage giving the perceived evil the powers of example and redemption. (Foucault, P. 66) The mad were neither a source of shame or taboo, madness was present everywhere and mingled with every experience by its images or its dangers. (Foucault, P. 66) However, during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the Enlightenment, and the emergence of the man of reason drastically changed peoples attitudes towards the insane: adness was shown, but on the other side of bars; if present, it was at a distance, under the eyes of a reason that no longer felt any relation to it and that would not compromise itself by too close a resemblance. After the Enlightenment a new set of values became prevalent, where reason was now considered the defining characteristic of being human, and therefore it followed that to be unreasonable was to be essentially inhuman. Foucault notes that to the enlightened men of the time: the) animality that rages in madness disposesses man of what is specifically human in him; not in order to deliver him over to other powers, but simply to establish him at the zero degree of his own nature. With their new perspective on the world, the people of seventeenth and eighteenth century Europe now felt a shame in the presence of the inhuman that the Renaissance had never experienced (Foucault, P. 68), the mentally ill were not seen as possessed or evil or ill but as a shameful sideshow, barely more than animals, provoking the mocking laughter and the insulting pity (Foucault, P. 9) of the regular spectators who at the time would regularly pay a small fee into the asylums to gawk at them. (Foucault, P. 68) Foucault draws further attention to the inhumane treatment of the institutionalized mad during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Considered by their unreasonable behaviour to have fallen into bestiality, and that their animality, in fact, protected the lunatic from whatever might be fragile, precarious, or sickly in man (Foucault, P. 4), they were treated as such and he records: It was common knowledge until the end of the eighteenth century that the insane could support the miseries of existence indefinitely. There was no need to protect them; they had no need to be covered or warmed. (Foucault, P. 74) Not simply did men of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries seen madness as a fall into bestiality, the frenzied behaviour and irrationality of the madman was to them a shameful lapse into mans basest level. It was important for their self image to disassociate themselves from the mad. Foucault notes that: Madness had become a thing to look at: no longer a monster inside oneself, but an animal with strange mechanisms, a bestiality from which man had long since been suppressed. (Foucault, P. 70) He contrast this to the view of the Church, who slow to take on the burgeoning attitudes of the Enlightenment, still seen madness with a humanity absent from from the attitudes of the men of reason. He suggests the Church found in madness a difficult but essential lesson: the guilty innocence of the animal in man. Foucault seems to be trying to show in his essay, through the descriptions of the treatement of the mentally ill, that we can learn a lesson from the irony that these enlightened attitudes towards madness, held with such firm belief at the time, now, in a modern context would be seen as extremely inhumane and cruel. A lesson that we must be careful in believing the prevalent conceptions of our time are free from our own inherent biases. In his essay Good and Evil, Good and Bad, Nietzsche calls attention to the fact that our conceptions of good and bad have changed drastically over the centuries. He traces the genealogy of the word good back to its origin in the Classical Age and records how it was was originally conceived as something wholly different to how it is today: The origin of the opposites good and bad is to be found in the pathos of nobility and distance, representing the dominant temper of a higher, ruling class in relation to a lower dependent one. (Nietzsche, P. 160) Nietzsche states that the morality of the nobility of the Classical Age was more immediate, where the notions of good, and pure were synonymous simply with their own being noble as opposed to plebeian, with their own natural dominance and impulsivity. The word pure, for example, was devoid of its current religious connotations: The pure man was originally one who washed himself, who refused to eat certain foods entailing skin diseases, who did not sleep with the unwashed plebeian women, who held blood in abomination hardly more than that.